Rules for Writing Whodunits?

Exchanging emails with my very good friend Maureen Vincent-Northam the other day, she suggested a plot for the Sanford 3rd Age Club Mystery series. Here’s an outline:

The Sanford gang of middle-aged rockers are on a week’s holiday at a caravan park in Cornwall. A mob of hippie type travellers invade the field next door. Someone is murdered, Joe, Sheila and Brenda investigate and solve it.

Do you like it? Are you frothing at the mouth with anticipation? Hmm. You need to know more before you can make your mind up? Sorry, but you may have quite a wait because it’s all I know right now.

The purpose of that little exercise was to demonstrate just how little I know about my titles when I start work on them. I don’t know who was killed or why or whodunit.

There are rules to producing whodunits. The crime should be carried out very early on. The detective and the killer should both appear no later than chapter two. The text should be sprinkled with red herrings and false trails. The clues should be laid out in the text so the reader has a chance of solving it.

All very laudable, but whoever laid them out should have checked on a few titles from the Queen of Crime. In Hercule Poirot’s Christmas, we’re well into the book before we meet the killer and we meet him/her before the crime is committed. Poirot himself doesn’t show up until page 101 in my copy.

I’m not comparing myself to the genius that was Agatha Christie, but from my point of view, there are no rules.

In my current WIP, another Sanford 3rd Age Club title, the real crime is not committed until the end of Chapter 5 (ish) and in The Filey Connection (published by Crooked {Cat} on March 2nd, plug, plug) it’s even later. In The Handshaker, there is no clue to the killer’s identity until very late in the novel, and in Voices, we don’t meet the real nemesis until near the end of the book.

So what am I doing while leading up to all this? I’m doing what my reading of Agatha Christie taught me; building up the background, inking in pictures of the location, establishing the various motives and possible suspects… oh and I’m chucking a few clues about, too.

I don’t have anything against rules and using them to plan my work. It’s just that even when I do, the story and characters take over from me, and usually, half way through the book, I learn that the person who I thought dunit, didn’t. It was someone else and for entirely different reasons than I first suspected.

Compare it, if you will, to route planning. I spent years of my working life travelling up and down the UK, so much so that there is nowhere I haven’t been and I know the roads like the back of my hand. As a consequence, I don’t own a satnav, and the result is I get there without running into narrow back lanes where traffic has been banned for the last year.

If I start with the Sanford 3rd Age Club at a caravan park and a bunch of hippies moving in next door, it means that anything can happen. And it frequently does.

There are rules. I ignore them without fear. Joe and his pals will sort it out for me.

About David Robinson

Comments

  1. I’m with you, David. Sometimes, rules are there to be broken. I love Agatha Christie as she sets the scene so nicely. You’re following in her steps in focusing on what’s going on first, then – ta daaa – a crime is committed. The reader is now ‘forced’ to think back. I like that. Keeps the suspense going and the reader wondering.

    In Dark Deceit, I planned the murder at the beginning, and the culprit was clear. A little later into the book, and the story changed when I introduced another potential suspect. I hadn’t banked on him at all, but the more I wrote, the clearer it became. Or did it really?? ;-)

    Sound advice!

  2. David Robinson on February 13, 2012 at 9:36 am said:

    Thanks Cathie.

    I’m glad to see there’s someone else who appreciate the ad hoc method of writing. I frequently write the last chapter first, but it doesn’t make any difference. By the time I get there, it needs to be rewritten.

    Incidentally, talking of Dark Deceit, I’m in the middle of (theoretically) re-designing the site and I will be carrying the cover image as soon as I’m through.

  3. I do the same, David. Sometimes the murder has already happened, sometimes it hasn’t. The murderer frequently changes, and once (this is an oft told tale) my editor asked me to change the murderer because there would be too much sympathy for him. Cue writing in a whole new character, virtually a complete rewrite, in two weeks. I don’t follow any rules, and as the books are going into their third edition with all new covers I must be doing something right!

  4. David Robinson on February 13, 2012 at 12:48 pm said:

    Thanks Lesley.

    It makes so happy that I’m not simply a sad sack.

  5. I concur – and certainly like the ad hoc approach. Why leave the mystery, shock and surprise for the reader alone. When writing I often surprise or shock myself along the way, then it becomes a real murder, mystery suspense! I have tried the plotting and planning route, but it then seems too scripted. I’m a rules rebel!

  6. David Robinson on February 13, 2012 at 10:10 pm said:

    Never thought of it quite like that, June, but I suppose you’re right. It annoys the hell out of me when characters take the novel into their own hands, though :)

    Thanks for stopping by.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>